Articles

In Legal Language, many terms are used in place of each other. But one needs a good understanding of these terms to understand the difference in them. Such two words that are used interchangeably are Lawyer and Advocate. But these are quite different terms.

You can also find differences between articles on various topics that you need to know. Just tap on the quick link available and get to know the basic differences between them.

What is the Difference Between Lawyer and Advocate

A Lawyer is a person who is studying law or holds a law degree. Whereas an Advocate is a person who not only has a law degree but can also represent clients in court. Knowing the difference between them is very important.

Subject	Lawyer	Advocate
Definition	A Lawyer is a term used to define a person who is still studying law or is a holder of a law degree.	An advocate is a person who holds a law degree and can represent a client and can plead on behalf of his client in court.
Experience	A Lawyer can be experienced or not because he can be a student studying in College and has not completed his degree as yet.	An Advocate is trained hard to deal with real-life situations in the court.
Representing a Client in the Court	A lawyer may or may not represent his client in the court of law.	An Advocate mostly does the duty of representing a client in the court of law since his trained and capable of doing so.
Fees	A Lawyer offers a limited number of services.	An Advocate offers many services, and his leading service for which he charges a lot is of fighting the case in the court of law.
Membership	To represent a client in court, a legal professional needs the Bar Council of India’s membership.	Advocates need the Bar Council of India’s membership to appear in court and to plead on behalf of their clients.

Definition

Before knowing any other difference between them, we need to know the fundamental difference between the meaning of both terms. A Lawyer is a term used to define a person who is still studying law or is a holder of a law degree.

To become an Advocate, he needs additional qualifications. On the other hand, an advocate is a person who holds a law degree and can represent a client and can plead on behalf of his client in court. So, both these terms are quite different from each other.

Experience

Another big difference between a Lawyer and an Advocate is that of experience. A Lawyer can be experienced or not because he can be a student studying in College and has not completed his degree as yet. Whereas an Advocate is a well-experienced person who not holds a degree but has also practised legally and has the real-life experience of fighting a case in a court.

Moreover, an Advocate is trained hard to deal with real-life situations in the court. An advocate can represent his client better than a Lawyer since an Advocate is more experienced and skilled.

Representing a Client in the Court

A lawyer may or may not represent his client in the court of law. An Advocate mostly does the duty of representing a client in the court of law since his trained and capable of doing so. He is well experienced in doing so.

He can help his client get the judgment in his favour and help win the case. On the other hand, a lawyer may only give legal advice to his client and may not be as successful as an Advocate to win the case for him. He is not so well versed in dealing with court matters and to fight a lawsuit.

Fees Charged

There is also a difference between the fees of both a Lawyer and an Advocate. The criteria for charging the fees are based on the experience and skill of both the professionals. On the one hand, the Advocate is a highly skilled and experienced professional who charges high in comparison to a Lawyer.

Lawyer, on the other hand, charges less since he is less qualified and experienced. A Lawyer offers a limited number of services, but an Advocate offers many services, and his leading service for which he charges a lot is of fighting the case in the court of law.

Membership

Another point of difference between both of them is that of membership. To represent a client in court, a legal professional needs the Bar Council of India’s membership. Advocates need the Bar Council of India’s membership to appear in court and plead on behalf of their clients.

It is easy for an Advocate to get the membership since he is educationally and legally qualified. But not all Lawyers are not eligible to get the Bar Council membership, and they may require additional qualification for it.

Introduction

Psychology and Sociology is two different yet closely related field. It is confusing for a beginner to look at their differences because of their similarities. In short, sociology is targeting a large group of people. Where psychology is targeting a single individual, in this discussion, we will measure them side by side.

You can also find differences between articles on various topics that you need to know. Just tap on the quick link available and get to know the basic differences between them.

What is the Difference Between Sociology and Psychology?

Psychology

Psychology is the science for understanding human behaviour. It uses an analytical approach to a person’s behaviour. It has a broad field of application. A skilled psychologist can treat a person’s mental or behavioural abnormality.

A human brain is a critical place to crack into. A skilled psychologist can get his access into one’s brain. They use various techniques and communicate effectively with their client. This is a deep field of study, and people are taking an interest in it too.

Sociology

Sociology is a close field to psychology. It is all about the study of social causes or behaviour of a large group of people. This field of study can help one understand the trigger points behind some social event or ongoing ritual.

A sociologist examines various group of people. Different races, different class, different religion are some of their main topic of study. A skilled sociologist can find an underlying cause behind a social situation or religious stigma.

Difference between Sociology and Psychology

Psychology	Sociology
It is about decoding a person’s brain.	Sociology is targeted towards a social perspective.
Job in this field needs emotional stability and interpersonal skill.	Job in this field needs one with analytical and critical skill and communication skill.
Helps us to see the world in respect of community, race and religion	Helps us to see the world through an individual’s mind
This examines a group’s social behaviour.	Examines a person’s individual behaviour
. It includes finding a reason behind emotional stress, depression, frustration, anxiety attack, panic attack and curing.	It includes finding causes behind a social ritual, social stigma, religious insecurity, unethical practices and even family problems in some case.

Similarities between Psychology and Sociology

1. Both of these fields include finding a reason behind a problem and finding a way to solve or cure it.
2. Both of these fields are interconnected, such as someone may find the reason behind one’s action is based on his or her social belief. The person will go to a psychologist, and he may find that the problem is hiding behind a social issue.

Here the two fields become interconnected.

3. These two fields always examine something judging the overall behaviour.
4. Both of these are scientific practices. Both include logical thinking, logical and critical analysis and supervised decision taking.

Questions and Answer on Difference between Sociology and Psychology

Question:
What is the major difference between these two fields?

Answer:
The major difference is dependent on society, and the other is dependent on a person’s individuality. This makes these two different from each other.

Question:
Where can a sociologist work?

Answer:
Sociologist mainly works in public service. This includes probation service, criminal justice, rehabilitation service. What they do there is they find social causes and try to judge them according to the causes.

Question:
Where can a psychologist work?

Answer:
A psychologist’s work field is more well known. We all have heard of a psychologist. They treat people with mental problems.

Introduction

According to Hindu Panchang, in a year, there are two Ayan’s (Solstices). In other words, the position of the Sun changes twice every year. These changes are known as Uttarayan (also summer solstice) and Dakshinayan (winter solstice). Both these periods take a duration of six months each to happen.

You can also find differences between articles on various topics that you need to know. Just tap on the quick link available and get to know the basic differences between them.

What is the Difference Between Uttarayan and Dakshinayan?

About Uttarayan

From the day of Makar Sankranti, Uttarayan begins. During Uttarayan days are longer and nights are shorter.

This period involves festivals and pilgrimages. The period of Uttarayan collides with the month of PaushMagh. Uttarayan is also known to be the period of Devas.

Donations, charities, yagyas, austerities, marriages, mundan etc. are considered to be auspicious during this period. This period is six months long. According to shastras, Uttarayan is actually considered to be a symbol of positivity.

About Dakshinayan

Dakshinayan usually begins on 21/22 June. On 21st June, the Sun travels from Uttarayan to Dakshinayan. According to many religious beliefs, Dakshinayan is considered to be the night of Kal Devas.

Nights are longer and days are usually shorter during Dakshinayan. During Dakshinayan, Sun do travels with an inclination, especially toward the southern direction.

The period that is associated with fasts is Dakshinayan. Many kinds of auspicious works are usually prohibited during the time of Dakshinayan.

Difference Between Uttarayan and Dakshinayan

Area of Differentiation:	Uttarayan	Dakshinayan
English Name:	Summer Solstice is also called as Uttarayan.	Winter Solstice is also called as Dakshinayan.
Seasons involved during the celebration:	Uttarayan comprises of Winter, Spring, and Summer.	Dakshinayan consist of winter, autumn, and monsoon.
Symbol of Celebration:	Positivity is the major symbol of Uttarayan.	Dakshinayan is usually associated with Negativity.
Duration of night and days:	Uttarayan has much longer days and shorter nights.	Dakshinayan is associated with quite longer nights and shorter days.
Encouragement of work:	Auspicious works are usually more encouraged during Uttarayan.	Auspicious works are usually more discouraged during Dakshinayan.
Time of Celebration:	Uttarayanbegins around 22nd December and lasts for six months till approximately 21st June.	Dakshinayan begins around 21st or 22nd June.

Similarities Between Uttarayan And Dakshinayan

• According to the Hindu scriptures, Uttarayan is when Sun travels from South to North, also known as Makar Sankranti.
• Out of six seasons, three of them fall in this solstice: winter, spring and summer.
• According to Puranas, in order to sacrifice BhishmaPitama life, he waited for Uttarayan.
• Uttarayan is considered the period of day time for God, while Dakshinayan is the night for them.
• In terms of sadhana, Uttarayan is for enlightenment while Dakshinayana is for purification.

Frequently Asked Question on Difference Between Uttarayan And Dakshinayan

Question:
What is meant by Uttarayana and Dakshinayana?

Answer:
The motion of the Sun going from south to north is known as Uttarayana – and when the Sun is moving towards north and reaches north it starts moving south, and it is called Dakshinayana – the Sun is moving towards south.

Question:
What is uttarayan called in English?

Answer:
Makar Sankranti is popularly known as Uttarayan or the Festival of Kites. Uttarayan actually a combination of two Sanskrit words, ‘uttar’ meaning north and ‘ayan’ meaning movement towards.

Question:
What is the importance of Makar Sankranti?

Answer:
Makar Sankranti is believed to be an auspicious time for peace and prosperity. The day is regarded quite important because of spiritual practices like to take a holy dip in rivers, especially Ganga, Yamuna, Krishna, Godavari and Cauvery to wash away sins.

India and the United States of America are both federal countries, which means it has one central government that acts for the country and several state governments looking after the country’s side areas and states. Both the countries government-run and exercise their power following the already made constitution. The countries do not impede the functions of their government. They have management distributed among the central and state government. They have a written constitution with different power at central and state levels.

You can also find differences between articles on various topics that you need to know. Just tap on the quick link available and get to know the basic differences between them.

 

What are the Similarities Between India and the US Government

India and the United States of America are known for their largest democracy and is run by the central and state governments. In 1789, the United States was considered a federal Republic, while India was declared Sovereign, Secular, Socialist, and Democratic Republic in 1950. The two countries were ruled by several small states with one single power of the central government and known as Federal Republics.

Although both India and the United States of America are federal countries, the work of government for both countries has differences. The United States federal constitution is harsh and rigid. It is a lot more federal in character than unitary. India is a quasi-federal country that is unitary.

The USA has a rigid constitution than the Indian Constitution– the United States of America has a concise and precise few constitution pages. In contrast, India has a considerable constitution consisting of three hundred and ninety-five articles and ten schedules. It has around twenty parts and is informal and unitary. Even though the American Constitution was made in 1789, it has only been amended twenty-seven times. In contrast, the Indian constitution came into action in 1950 and has been amended ninety-four times. Hence, proving that the Indian body is easy to amend.
India follows the Parliamentary Government, whereas the US follows Presidential Government– India has a parliamentary government with Prime Minister and cabinet ministers consisting of real powers. At the same time, the President is just a nominal head. However, in the United States, the President is the supreme head of the state. His ministers are known as the presidential form of government. The President of the United States can only enjoy power for four years, while the Indian Prime minister can enjoy power for five years, and as far as the party wins in the majority in Lok Sabha. India has a complex multi-party election while the United States has bi-party elections.
Judicial System Is Different In Both Countries Of India And United States– The United States of America is a developed country and has a modern judicial system. On the contrary, the judicial system of India is growing. In the US, the judge holds his duty as long as he can perform his duties. However, in the case of the Indian government, the district judge can perform his duties only until the age of fifty-eight, while the judge of a high court can hold his post until the age of sixty-two. The Supreme Court judge, however, has to retire at sixty-five.
Citizenship: Indian constitution offers and accepts only single citizenship for everyone. However, the United States of America issues double citizenship which means that a person can be a citizen of two countries: the USA.

Therefore, we can say that although the two federal countries are quite similar, yet they have a fair share of differences.

Introduction

The difference between Islamic and Indian Style Architecture is important from the perspective of Indian Art, Architecture and Culture Syllabus. Architectural entities that showcased multiple unique styles are known as Indo-Islamic architecture or Indo-Saracenic.

You can also find differences between articles on various topics that you need to know. Just tap on the quick link available and get to know the basic differences between them.

What is the Difference Between Indian and Islamic Style of Architecture?

About Indian Style Architecture

Undoubtedly, one of the most lasting achievements of Indian civilization is its architecture—Indian architecture, which took centuries to evolve, as a result of geographical conditions and socio-economic.

Different types of Indian architectural styles include transformed by the forces of history considered unique to India, with a mass of expressions over space and time.

A vast range of architectural specimens got evolved, as a result of vast diversities, retaining a certain amount of continuity across history.

About Islamic Style Architecture

From the 7th century, the building traditions of Muslim populations of the Middle East and elsewhere represents Islamic architecture. The architecture that found its highest expression in religious buildings such as the mosque and madrasah is Islamic Architecture.

The characteristic includes rich semicircular horseshoe arch, decoration of surfaces that were nonrepresentational were employed from early times. With the creation of the hypostyle of the mosque (see hypostyle hall) religious architecture came into its own in Iraq and Egypt.

Alhambra is one of the greatest examples of secular Islamic architecture. For a full treatment of the subject, see Islamic arts.

The difference between Islamic and Indian Style Architecture

Area Of Difference	Indian Style Architecture	Islamic Style Architecture
Place of Evolution	At different ages, in different parts of India, Indian Style of Architecture got evolved.	Islamic style of architecture evolved after the advent of Islam. It was influenced by Persian, Byzantine, and other architectures.
Popular Style	The popularly known ‘Trabeate Style’ is an Indian Style of Architecture.	Mehrab Style is a well known Islamic Style of Architecture.
Physical Representation	Temples, Rock Cut caves, Forts, Palaces come under the Indian Style of Architecture.	The Islamic Style of Architecture had its influenced in Tombs, Forts, Mosques.
Distinctive Style	In Indian Style architecture, Temples were constructed using three distinctive styles: Dravidian Style, Nagara style, and Visara Style.	Islamic architecture had three different styles – Indian style, Eastern Tradition – it was a blend of Mesopotamian style, the Greco-Roman and Persian Tradition.

Similarities between Islamic and Indian Style Architecture

Indian vs Islamic Style Architecture, to learn more about the similarities it is better to thoroughly know Nagara, Dravidian Style Architecture, and Indo-Islamic Architecture. Visit the below-given links to learn about Nagara style architecture, Dravidian Style architecture, Indo-Islamic Architecture, Gandhara and Mathura School of Art, Buddhist and Jain Architecture.

FAQs on Difference Between Indian and Islamic Style Of Architecture

Question:
What is the major key difference between the Nagara and Dravidian styles of temple design?

Answer:
The difference between Nagara and Dravidian Style of Temple Architecture is that Nagara Style multiple Shikhara and towers while Dravidian Style has single Shikhara and tower.

Question:
What is meant by the Indo Islamic style of architecture?

Answer:
Indo-Islamic architecture is the architecture of the Indian subcontinent produced by and for Islamic patrons and purposes.

Question:
How did Islam influence architecture in India?

Answer:
After the 13th century, to the established Indian style, Muslim conquerors introduced Islamic architecture. The Muslims adopted fundamental elements of Indian architecture such as balconies supported by brackets, courtyards surrounded by colonnades and the lavish decoration of all architecture.