Kishen

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 4 A Question of Trust are part of NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English. Here we have given NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 4 A Question of Trust.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 4 A Question of Trust

TEXTUAL EXERCISES

Read and Find Out (Pages 20 & 22)

Question 1.
What does Horace Danby like to collect ?
Answer:
Horace Danby likes to collect books. He loves rare, expensive books.

Question 2.
Why does he steal every year ?
Answer:
He robbed every year. He robbed money which could last for one whole year. So he didn’t need to rob again and again.

He was a typical thief because he stole only once a year. He stole to buy rare and expensive books only.

Question 3.
Who is speaking to Horace Danby ?
Answer:
It is the voice of the lady in the house. Horace thinks that she is the mistress of the house. But she is a thief like him who passes as the landlady.

Question 4.
Who is the real culprit in the story ? (V. Imp.)
Answer:
The real culprit is the lady thief. She poses before Horace Danby as the landlady of the Grange. Danby has entered the house to steal. But before him that lady thief is already there.

Think About It (Page 25)

Question 1.
Did you begin to suspect, before the end of the story, that the lady was not the person Horace Danby took her to be ? If so, at what point did you realise this, and how ?
Answer:
Well, in the beginning the lady appeared on the scene. I did not suspect her. But when she said “I have always liked the wrong kind of people”, I suspected her. Then she said that if Horace did ‘something’ for her, she would let him go.

Question 2.
What are the subtle ways in which the lady manages to deceive Horace Danby into thinking she is the lady of the house ? Why doesn’t Horace suspect that something is wrong ? (V. Imp.)
Answer:
First, the lady speaks with confidence to deceive Horace. She has firmness in her voice. She smiles at him while talking. There is sharpness also in her voice as she continues talking. She then threatens him with the idea of‘prison’. In this way she impresses him to be the landlady.

Question 3.
“Horace Danby was good and respectable—but not completely honest”. Why do you think this description is apt for Horace ? Why can’t he be categorised as a typical thief ?
Answer:
This description fits well on Horace Danby. Horace enjoys a good reputation as ‘a good, honest citizen’. Then he steals only once a year. He covers his stealing under his profession of making locks. He also loves reading books. So due to these reasons he can’t be categorised as a typical thief.

Question 4.
Horace Danby was a meticulous planner but still he faltered. Where did he go wrong and why ? (V. Imp.)
Answer:
He was rightly a meticulous planner. He planned carefully each year just before stealing. But he faltered. He didn’t see into the lady’s sweet, clever and crafty talks. It may be because he had been in the house as a thief. And he had been apprehended red-handed. His ” fear of prison blunted his mind to see through the lady’s tricks. Then he was a thief.

Talk About It

Question 1.
Do you think Horace Danby was unfairly punished, or that he deserved what he got ?
Answer:
I think Horace Danby was unfairly punished in that theft. He was a thief, no doubt. But he was not a full-fledged thief. It is in the sense of the material benefit out of the theft. However, all the material evidence was against it. In the eyes of the law he was a thief. So he was punished. But in the spirit of justice, there was something important. It was : it did not make him a thief.

Question 2.
Do Intentions justify actions ? Would you, like Horace Danby, do something wrong if you thought your ends justified the means ? Do you think that there . are situations in which it is excusable to act less than honestly ?
Answer:
It is not correct to say that intentions justify actions. In the case of Horace Danby his intentions were to get free. If the lady of the house had been true to her verdict, he was safe. His intentions to open the safe did not justify his actions. He was proved wrong in them. It was because his actions took him to jail. However, there was nothing to justify that.

I, like Horace Danby, would not do anything wrong if my ends justified the means. In fact, we must see that wrong is wrong. Then we must analyse our actions and their results.

It is also a fact that there are situations in life. In them it is excusable to act less than honestly. Life has such facets. Man gets involved without any fault of him.

We hope the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 4 A Question of Trust help you. If you have any query regarding NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 4 A Question of Trust drop a comment below and we will get back to you at the earliest.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 3 The Midnight Visitor are part of NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English. Here we have given NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 3 The Midnight Visitor.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 3 The Midnight Visitor

TEXTUAL EXERCISES

Read and Find Out (Pages 14 & 15)

Question 1.
How is Ausable different from other secret agents ?
Answer:
Ausable was not an alert and smart secret agent as Fowler had expected. He was very fat. He spoke French and German with a slight American accent. He used ordinary telephones to make calls. He lived in a mediocre and dark French hotel. This way he did not fit the description of any secret agent.

Question 2.
Who is Fowler and what is his first authentic thrill of the day ?
Answer:
Fowler is a writer. He wants to meet Ausable to cover him up for writing for his publication. His first authentic thrill of the day is quite clear. It is that he outwitted Ausable in a simple way.

Question 3.
How has Max got in ?
Answer:
Max has used a passkey to enter Ausable’s room in his absence. He wants to get a ‘report’ on some new missiles.

Question 4.
How does Ausable say he got in ?
Answer:
Ausable says that Max got in his room through an ordinary window. It was in the balcony. He would complain against it (balcony) to the hotel authorities. It needed to be closed.

Think About It (Page 18)

Question 1.
“Ausable did not fit any description of a secret agent Fowler had ever read”. What do secret agents in books and films look like, in your opinion ? Discuss in groups or in class some stories or movies featuring spies, detectives and secret agents, and compare their appearance with that of Ausable in this story. (You may mention characters from fiction in languages other than English. In English fiction you may have come across Sherlock Holmes. Hercule Poirot, or Miss Marple. Have you watched any movies featuring James Bond ?)
Answer:
In my opinion, secret agents in books and films look differently. They wear flowing . robes. These are like long overcoats and a hat on their head. This hat hides their faces. Then they have very keen and sharp eyes.

The comparison with prominent secret agents can be done at class level. These secret agents can be Sherlock Holmes, Hercule Poirot or Miss Maple. This may be done with the guidance and supervision of the class teacher.

I saw some movies featuring James Bond. It is titled : 007 James Bond, The Golden Eye, Tomorrow Never Dies, etc.

Question 2.
How does Ausable manage to make Max believe that there is a balcony attached to his room ? Look back at his detailed description of it. What makes it a convincing story ?
Answer:
First Ausable says that there is a balcony before his room. It is also before the other room adjoining it. It is the next room. Ausable tells Max that there is police at the door when knocking is heard. Max is frightened at this. He asks Ausable to send the police back. He would go and wait on the balcony. But there is no balcony. Max falls down.

Question 3.
Looking back at the story, when do you think Ausable thought up his plan for getting rid of Max ? Do you think he had worked out his plan in detail right from the beginning ? Or did he make up a plan taking advantage of events as they happened ?
Answer:
Ausable saw Max in his room when he switched on the light. Max had a small automatic pistol in his hand. Ausable felt shocked to see him. He decided there and then to get I rid of Max.

No, he had not worked out his plan in detail right from the beginning. He made the plan there and then when he saw Max there. Max had a pistol in his hand.

Talk About It

Question 1.
In this story, Ausable shows great ‘presence of mind’, or the ability to think quickly, and act calmly and wisely, in a situation of danger and surprise. Give examples from your own experience, or narrate a story, which shows someone’s presence of mind.
Answer:
I remember one similar incident that happened to me. Once as a small boy, I was sleeping in the house. I was very afraid of ghosts or thieves. At midnight there was some sound of utensils from the kitchen. It was quite near my room. I was greatly scared. But the sound continued. After a few moments I heard the movement of footsteps on the floor. I do not know what happened to me then. I got up silently. I held the leg of the thief tightly. I dug my teeth into his calf. Actually I had come out of my bed. Then I saw the leg in the moonrays there. I do not know what had made me do so. My parents came crying “A thief! A thief!” They declared me ‘a hero’.

Question 2.
Discuss what you would do in the situations described below. Remember that presence of mind comes out of a state of mental preparedness. If you have thought about possible problems or dangers, and about how to act in such situations, you have a better chance of dealing with such situations if they do arise.

• A small fire starts in your kitchen.
• A child starts to choke on a piece of food.
• An electrical appliance starts to hiss and gives out sparks.
• A bicycle knocks down a pedestrian.
• It rains continuously for more than twenty-four hours.
• A member of your family does not return home at the usual or expected time.

You may suggest other such situations.

Answer:

For discussion at class level with the supervision, advice and direction of the teacher.

• If there is a small fire in the kitchen, a blanket should be put over it at once. Water may be thrown on it. In case of a short circuit, all members should go out at once.
• When a child starts choking on a piece of food, his or her back should be thumped slowly. This way the piece of food may be thrown out. He or she should at once be hospitalised if the condition worsens.
• If an electrical appliance starts to hiss and gives out sparks, the current should be stopped. The appliance should be got repaired or its use be stopped.
• The pedestrian should at once be attended to. If there is a serious mishap, calling for an ambulance is desirable. Public help may be sought.
• In that case one should go to the roof and contact the neighbours. Necessary things like food articles, medicines etc, should be collected at one place. Distress signals may be sent.
• His places of visit, his office, his friends, etc, should be contacted at once. One shouldn’t be panicky. One should think about the hurdles that could have withheld him. If he comes, it is O.K. If not police should be contacted.

We hope the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 3 The Midnight Visitor help you. If you have any query regarding NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 3 The Midnight Visitor drop a comment below and we will get back to you at the earliest.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 2 The Thief’s Story are part of NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English. Here we have given NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 2 The Thief’s Story.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 2 The Thief’s Story

TEXTUAL EXERCISES

Read and Find Out (Pages 8 & 10)

Question 1.
Who does T refer to in this story ?
Answer:
“I” in this story refers to the narrator.

Question 2.
What is he “a fairly successful hand” at ?
Answer:
He is ‘a fairly successful hand’ at stealing things (because he is a thief).

Question 3.
What does he get from Anil in return for his work ?
Answer:
He gets from Anil in return for his work, a place and food. It is for sleeping and food to eat.

Question 4.
How does the thief think Anil will react to the theft ?
Answer:
The thief thinks that Anil would be sad when he would discover the theft.

Question 5.
What does he say about the different reactions of people when they are robbed ? (V. Imp.)
Answer:
He says that a greedy man shows fear. A rich man shows anger. A poor man shows acceptance. There are different reactions of people when they are robbed.

Question 6.
Does Anil realise that he has been robbed ? (V. Imp.)
Answer:
I think Anil does realise that he has been robbed. Persons like Anil have a large heart. They do not attach importance to money. Anil reviews the situation. Then he decides to overlook Hari Singh’s, theft.

Think About It (Page 13)

Question 1.
What are Hari Singh’s reactions to the prospect of receiving an education ? Do they change over time ? (Hint. Compare for example, the thought, “I knew that once I could write like an educated man there would be no limit to what I could achieve” with these later thoughts: “Whole sentences, I knew, could one day bring me more than a few hundred rupees. It was a simple matter to steal—and sometimes just as simple to be caught. But to be a really big man, a clever and respected man, was something else.”) What makes him return to Anil ?
Answer:
Hari Singh’s reactions to the possibility of receiving an education -undergo a change. In the beginning he thinks one thing. It is that if he wrote like an educated man he could achieve success (or money). His later thoughts prove this change. Later he feels that if he wrote whole sentences, he would get more than a few hundred rupees. Money doesn’t hold much attraction for him now.

He wants from education to become a big man, a clever and respected man. May be Anil is his idol in that. This makes him return to Anil. It is because only Anil could teach him as he wants.

Question 2.
Why does not Anil hand the thief over to the police ? Do you think most people would have done so ? In what ways is Anil different from such employers ?
Answer:
I feel that Anil is a large-hearted person. First, he does realise that he has been robbed. But he reviews the whole situation. He thinks that if he gives the thief to the police, he may become a criminal. He decides to reform the thief differently. It is showing grace, kindness and sympathy.

Most people could not do so like Anil. They could have handed over such persons to the police after first beating them themselves. Anil is different because he decides to reform the thief through kindness and sympathy.

Talk About It

Question 1.
Do you think people like Anil and Hari Singh are found only in fiction, or are there such people in real life ?
Answer:
I think people like Anil and Hari Singh are found in real life also. But their number is very very small.

Question 2.
Do you think it a significant detail in the story that Anil is a struggling writer ? Does this explain his behaviour in any way ?
Answer:
It is a significant detail in the story that Anil is a struggling writer. His getting little money and getting some from time to time shows this. Then he has a heart of gold as mostly the writers have. When they get money, they spend it lavishly. They are in fact, the gems of humanity.

Question 3.
Have you met anyone like Hari Singh ? Can you think and imagine the circumstances that can turn a fifteen-year-old boy into a thief ?
Answer:
Yes, I have also met a boy like Hari Singh. I think the circumstances make one a thief. For example, if one’s family has sources of livelihood its member can’t be a thief. But if it is a family of thieves, the children shall surely be thieves later. Food and its lack make a human being a thief.

Question 4.
Where is the story set ? (You can get clues from the names of the persons and places mentioned in it.) Which language or languages are spoken in these places ? Do you think the characters in the story spoke to each other in English ?
Answer:
The story is set in Delhi, capital of India. The clues are : ‘The Jumna Sweet Shop’, ‘railway station’, ‘The Lucknow Express was just moving out’. Hindi, English and other Indian languages are spoken in it.

I do not think the characters in the story spoke to each other in English. However, they might have used some English words. These could be like ‘time’, ‘train’, ‘clock tower’. These are now parts of Hindi language as a whole.

We hope the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 2 The Thief’s Story help you. If you have any query regarding NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 2 The Thief’s Story drop a comment below and we will get back to you at the earliest.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 1 A Triumph of Surgery are part of NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English. Here we have given NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 1 A Triumph of Surgery.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 1 A Triumph of Surgery

TEXTUAL EXERCISES

Read and Find Out (Pages 1 & 3)

Question 1.
Why is Mrs. Pumphrey worried about Tricki ? (V. Imp.)
Answer:
Mrs. Pumphrey is worried and shocked about Tricki. It has become hugely fat. It looks like a bloated sausage. Its eyes are blood red and rheumy. Its tongue lolls down its jaws.

Question 2.
What does she do to help him ? Is she wise in this ?
Answer:
She at once calls Mr. Herriot for Tricki. Mr. Herriot is a veterinary doctor. She is wise in this. No one can know about animals except the veterinary doctor.

Question 3.
Who does “I” refer to in this story ?
Answer:
“I” in this story, refers to James Herriot, the veterinary surgeon.

Question 4.
Is the narrator as rich as Tricki’s mistress ?
Answer:
No, the narrator is not as rich as Tricki’s mistress.

Question 5.
How does he treat the dog ?
Answer:
He takes the dog Tricki to his surgery. There he does not give much food to it. He instead cuts its food. He keeps it on a strict diet. He keeps it under observation. At the end of the second day Tricki changes. It starts showing some interest in the surroundings. On the third day it whimpers.

Question 6.
Why is he tempted to keep Tricki on as a permanent guest ? (V. Imp.)
Answer:
It was a temptation to keep Tricki as a permanent guest. It was because Mrs Pumphrey started sending fresh eggs, two dozen at a time. The staff of Mr Herriot ate these eggs. There came bottles of wine etc. It was really a great thing for them. Mr. Herriot does not give these to Tricki.

Question 7.
Why does Mrs. Pumphrey think the dog’s recovery is “a triumph of surgery” ?
Answer:
She thinks so because it is the surgery, that is, hospital. It has made Tricki all right. Its stay at the surgery has cured it of its illness.

Think About It (Page 6)

Question 1.
What kind of a person do you think the narrator, a veterinary surgeon, is ? Would you say he is tactful as well as full of common sense ? (Imp.) (CBSE 2012)
Answer:
I think the narrator, a veterinary surgeon is a very practical man. He is also tactful and has a lot of common sense. He is kind-hearted and jovial kind of fellow. He, at once, understands Tricki’s illness. He wants to keep Tricki for a longer period. It may be his selfishness because he gets Jiuge supplies from Mrs. Pumphrey for Tricki. But it is not a mean quality.

Question 2.
Do you think Tricki was happy to go home ? What do you think will happen now ?
Answer:
Yes, Tricki was happy to go home. It is seen in one fact. When Mrs. Pumphrey comes to the surgery to take Tricki home, it jumps into her lap. It swarms over her. It also licks her face out of great excitement.

I think that Mrs. Pumphrey will again give Tricki a lot of food. It would grow sick again due to overeating and no exercise.

Question 3.
Do you think this is a real-life episode, or mere fiction ? Or is it a mixture of both ?
Answer:
I think it is a real-life episode with some part of fiction. But it is not mere and whole fiction. In fact it is a mixture of both.

Talk About It

Question 1.
This episode describes the silly behaviour of a rich woman who is foolishly indulgent, perhaps because she is lonely. Do you think such people are merely silly, or can their actions cause harm to others ?
Answer:
I think that persons like Mrs. Pumphrey are over-indulgent because she is lonely. She can be called silly also because she lacks in common sense. All know that overeating and no physical exercise can make even an elephant ill. Such people can cause harpa to others as Mrs. Pumphrey does to Tricki.

Question 2.
Do you think there are also parents like Mrs. Pumphrey ?
Answer:
Yes, there are parents like Mrs. Pumphrey. They are doting on their children or pet animals. Later when things get out of their control they repent much. But losses can’t be made up.

Question 3.
What would you have done if you were : (i) a member of the staff in Mrs. Pumphrey’s household (ii) a neighbour ? What would your life have been like, in general ?
Answer:
If I were in the staff of Mrs. Pumphrey. I could have politely advised her in the matter. The advice would be : cut down Tricki’s food. Give it light food, if it had a liking for it. If I had been her neighbour, I could have advised her more emphatically. Tricki was not ill. But it was the effect of rich food given to it.

My life would have been all right. A man or a woman should have some practical common sense also.

Question 4.
What would you have done if you were in the narrator’s place ?
Answer:
If I had been in the narrator’s place, I would have done the same thing as he did. He did not exploit Mrs. Pumphrey, nor would I do. Eating a part of Mrs. Pumphrey’s food meant for Tricki was not bad in taste. It was playful.

We hope the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 1 A Triumph of Surgery help you. If you have any query regarding NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 1 A Triumph of Surgery drop a comment below and we will get back to you at the earliest.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English First Flight Poem Chapter 11 For Anne Gregory are part of NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English. Here we have given NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English First Flight Poem Chapter 11 For Anne Gregory.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English First Flight Poem 11 For Anne Gregory

TEXTUAL QUESTIONS
(Page 141)

Thinking About the Poem

Question 1.
What does the young man mean by “great honey-coloured / Ramparts at your ear ?” Why does he say that young men are “thrown into despair” by them ?
Answer:
By these the poet means golden outer parts of the young woman’s ears. He says that young men are “thrown into despair” by them. It is because they look ugly.

Question 2.
What colour is the young woman’s hair ? What does she say she can change it to ? Why would she want to do so ?
Answer:
The colour of the young woman’s hair is ‘white’. She can colour it ‘brown, black or carrot’. She can change it to brown, black or carrot. She would want to do so as per the latest fashion. It would be for looking attractive and beautiful.

Question 3.
Objects have qualities which make them desirable to others. Can you think of some objects (a car, a phone, a dress…) and say what qualities make one object more desirable than another ? Imagine you were trying to sell an object: what qualities would you emphasise ?
Answer:
These objects can be ‘shoes, ornaments, hair dyes, hair styles’ etc. Wearing costly ornaments and behaving in an affected manner etc, can make one more desirable than another. But these are momentary and ‘die’ after some time. It is because they emphasize the physical aspect of beauty. Physical beauty is external. Internal aspects of beauty are lasting. These are : affectionate or sympathetic attitude or behaviour, compassion, pity, love etc.

If I were to sell an object I would emphasize the useful and durable qualities. I wouldn’t favour artificial, temporary and unreal ones.

Question 4.
What about people ? Do we love others because we like their qualities, whether physical or mental ? Or is it possible to love someone “for themselves alone” ? Are some people ‘more lovable’ than others ? Discuss this question in pairs or in groups, considering points like the following.

(i) a parent or caregiver’s love for a newborn baby, for a mentally or physically challenged child, for a clever child or a prodigy
(ii) the public’s love for a film star, a sportsperson, a politician, or a social worker
(iii) your love for a friend, or brother or sister
(iv) your love for a pet, and the pet’s love for you.

Answer:
Such an attitude can and can’t be applied because human society is as such. We have to overlook certain weaknesses of the human beings seeing different situations. Essentially, we love others because of their physical and mental qualities. We also love them ‘for themselves alone’. For example, a mother loves her child whether he or she is or is not beautiful. There are some people ‘more lovable’ than others. It is because of their qualities of head and heart.

The following to be discussed in pairs in groups :

(i) A parent’s love for a newborn baby, or a mentally or physically challenged child, etc, will almost be the same. It would be more for a clever or a prodigy because of his or her inborn traits. However, the love of a caregiver .will not be of that level. That would be determined by the relationship.

(ii) The public’s love for a film star, a sportsperson, a politician or a social worker is situational. It will be there till that person works as the public expects. Players, sportspersons, filmstars and politicians are out once they fail to meet the public aspirations. Politicians get defeated. Filmstars, sportspersons etc, are abused. Rotten tomatoes are thrown at them. They are shown black flags if they fail to come up to the public’s estimate. They are also abused in the social media.

(iii) My love for a friend or brother or sister can’t be the same. A friend is a friend. A brother or sister are a brother or sister. But my love gets shaken if they fail to act what they are. A friend in that case may be ‘defriended’. But a brother or sister can’t be done with so.

(iv) My love for a pet will be less affected by the pet’s behaviour. Her or his being not a human being will continue to get my love. Her or his winning my heart by tricks/ feats etc, shall determine my love.

Question 5.
You have perhaps concluded that people are not objects to be valued for their qualities or riches rather than for themselves. But elsewhere Yeats asks the question: How can we separate the dancer from the dance ? Is it possible to separate ‘the person himself or herself from how the person looks, sounds, walks, and so on 1 Think of how you or a friend or member of your family has changed over the years. Has your relationship also changed ? In what way ?
Answer:
It is rather difficult to separate ‘the person himself or herself from how the person behaves. But a certain distinction can be made. Actually man or woman must understand that he or she is not one man. He or she hides several persons in them. She or he must behave in keeping with those things in mind.

Yes, I have seen how a member of my family has changed over the years. It is due to stupid and artificial reasons. It is also due to her not taking the relationships seriously, t Seeing that my relationship has also changed. She has abused the faith that we had in her earlier. Now we do not have any faith in her. We are conscious of her every time. Our relationship is not deep. It has become showy and artificial. It mustn’t be this way.

We hope the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English First Flight Poem Chapter 11 For Anne Gregory help you. If you have any query regarding NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English First Flight Poem Chapter 11 For Anne Gregory drop a comment below and we will get back to you at the earliest.